Thursday, July 19, 2012

STRING THEORY & THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

Are the social sciences like string theory? Some of the controversy surrounding string theory in physics sounds familiar...

"Here are some of the most significant criticisms levied against string theory (or the string theorists who practice it):
  • String theory is unable to make any useful prediction about how the physical world behaves, so it can’t be falsified or verified.
  • String theory is so vaguely defined and lacking in basic physical principles that any idea can be incorporated into it.
  • String theorists put too much weight on the opinions of leaders and authorities within their own ranks, as opposed to seeking experimental verification.
  • String theorists present their work in ways that falsely demonstrate that they’ve achieved more success than they actually have. (This isn’t necessarily an accusation of lying, but may be a fundamental flaw in how success is measured by string theorists and the scientific community at large.)
  • String theory gets more funding and academic support than other theoretical approaches (in large part because of the aforementioned reported progress).
  • String theory doesn’t describe our universe, but contradicts known facts of physical reality in a number of ways, requiring elaborate hypothetical constructions that have never been successfully demonstrated.
(Excerpt from The String Wars: Outlining the Arguments by Andrew Zimmerman Jones and Daniel Robbins Link ).